Legal Opinion
Ring v. Estee Lauder, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 1988No. 88 Civ. 0112 (DNE)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Jane Ring, has filed the instant action against the defendant, Estee Lauder, Inc. (“Lauder”), alleging four claims: (1) unjust enrichment and breach of fiduciary duty; (2) common law fraud; (3) misappropriation of a trade secret; and (4) copyright infringement. After substantially all discovery had been completed, Lauder moved this court for an order, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56, granting summary judgment as to each of the four claims. Oral argument was heard on the motion on December 15, 1988. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- James Joseph Corselli v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, James E. Sullivan, [Pedro] Berrios and Ronald G. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Downey v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Educational Sales Programs, Inc. v. Dreyfus Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. GoldfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Oasis Music, Inc. v. 900 U.S.A., Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Blank v. PollackDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Paul v. HaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.