Legal Opinion

Mathes v. Patterson-UTI Drilling Co. L.L.C.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 2014No. Civil Action No. H-12-3664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion & Order

GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge.

Pending before the court are defendants, Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. and Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, L.L.C.’s motions for summary judgment pertaining to all of plaintiffs’ claims (Dkts. 27, 30, 31). After considering the motions, responses, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that defendants’ motions should be GRANTED and all of plaintiffs’ claims dismissed.1

I. Background

This case involves the alleged negligence and gross negligence liability of the owner of an oil and gas lease in North Dakota and its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hughes Wood Products, Inc. v. WagnerTexas Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Hess Corp., et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  2. ChampionX Corporation v. AIG Insurance Company of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  3. Werner Enters., Inc. v. Picus S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  4. Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. National American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API