Legal Opinion
Kreklow v. Miller
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
We will first consider the issues raised by Classified Risk Insurance Company.
Did Susan Miller make representations in applying for insurance from Classified which constituted misrepresentations as a matter of law ?
Classified contends that Susan Miller made misrepresentations in her application for insurance of such a nature that the policy issued thereon should be void as a matter of law.
Sec. 209.06 (1), Stats., provides:
“Insurance; application; effect. (1) No oral or written statement, representation or warranty made by the insured or in his behalf in the negotiation of a contract of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Delaney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Thompson v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Netzel v. State Sand & Gravel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- O. D. Nickols v. John R. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Nolden v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.