Legal Opinion

Carr v. Schmid

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Shanley N. Egeth, J.

This is a motion made on behalf of the New York City Department of Health to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon it by the defendant herein, which requires it to produce existing venereal disease records of plaintiff for the trial of this action.

Plaintiff herein seeks to recover damages from the defendant manufacturer of an intrauterine device, claiming it was unfit for use, in that it aggravated a gonorrhea infection allowing it to develop into a pelvic inflammatory *648condition. Defendant will seek to prove that the condition was caused, worsened or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Prink v. Rockefeller Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. Al-KananiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Levine v. BornsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Greenberg v. CBS Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. FeijooNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API