Legal Opinion
In re Pye
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 2012No. 12-BG-83PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In its January 26, 2012, Report and Recommendation, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“BPR” or the “Board”) unanimously1 agreed with the Hearing Committee that respondent, John H. Pye, Jr., should be disbarred for misappropriation 2 of entrusted estate funds and *962violation of numerous Rules of Professional Conduct3 in connection with his appointment as the Successor Personal Representative of the Green Estate. Bar Counsel supports BPR’s Report and Recommendation.
This court “must ‘accept the findings of fact made by the Board unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- In re Haines and In re Campoamor-SanchezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re Haines and In re Campoamor-SanchezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re KrameDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.