Legal Opinion
People v. Milio
Yonkers City Court
Decided January 25, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gilbert Rabin, J.
Defendant, by this motion, seeks to have sections 38.30 and 38-44 of the Yonkers City Code declared unconstitutional and the information dismissed as violative of a citizen’s rights on the following grounds: 1. That the statute interferes with the rights of contract in relation to his business beyond reasonable police power; 2. That the statute requires the landlord to become a guarantor for a proper and adequate heating system and its collateral parts and is unreasonable; and 3. That the statute, though labeled a violation, is in effect, by sentence, a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Jack Resnick & Sons, Inc.Yonkers City Court · 1985
- People v. TrolioJustice Court of Scarsdale · 1996