Legal Opinion
People v. Jack Resnick & Sons, Inc.
Yonkers City Court
Decided March 29, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John R. LaCava, J.
Defendant, by this motion, seeks to have the instant information dismissed on two grounds, alleging that:(a) City Code of Yonkers § 103-1 is unconstitutional; and that(b) The information is insufficient and defective on its face.
With regard to the latter ground, the original moving papers
request that the court order the complainant to file a supporting deposition particularizing the specific conduct which constituted a violation of the ordinance.
The basis for instant information was a summons issued by Sanitation Enforcement Officer Ralph Nappi on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley v. VolpeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- City of Buffalo v. HawksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Drelich v. Kenlyn Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Pratt v. TofanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Main Private Car Service, Inc. v. Mayor of YonkersNew York Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. TrolioJustice Court of Scarsdale · 1996