Legal Opinion
Kent v. Wright
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 19, 1946No. 32413PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V.C.J.
This is an action to recover damages for conversion of 37 head of cattle. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs have appealed.
The plaintiffs, Kent & Sargent, are partners doing business at Vernon, Tex., as Vernon Livestock Commission Company. The defendant, Ralph O. Wright, is engaged in business as Ralph O. Wright Commission Company at the Oklahoma City stockyards, and is a “market agency” as that term is defined in the Packers & Stockyards Act, 7 U.S. C.A. §201. Martin Kuykendall is engaged in the business of buying…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mason City Production Credit Ass'n v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Parma v. First Nat. Bank of CameronTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Blackwell v. Laird and LairdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- First Nat. Bank of Byars v. Griffin GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Kemper Grain Co. v. HarbourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. First National Bank at ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County Auction, Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Hiram Wall, D/B/A Hiram Wall Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962