Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2005No. 05-50639UnpublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Reviewing under the same standard as the district court, we affirm the ALJ’s final decision denying Mr. Castillo’s claim for disability insurance benefits under sections 216(i) and 223 of Title II of the Social Security Act, (42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.) for the following reasons:

1. We find there is substantial evidence of record supporting the ALJ’s determination that Mr. Castillo is not disabled within the meaning of the Act. No treating, examining, or evaluating physician has indicated that Mr. Castillo was unable or is expected to be unable to work for twelve consecutive months.

2.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perez v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Antonio FRAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Frank v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Pete FALCO, SSN 452-44-9336, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Watson v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Acosta v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Raper v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  3. Parrish v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  4. Quintanilla v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Alam v. AndrewDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API