ATTORNEY M v. Mississippi Bar
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
621 So.2d 220 (1992)
ATTORNEY M
v.
MISSISSIPPI BAR.
No. 90-BA-0632.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
July 1, 1992.
Thomas J. Lowe, Jr., Wm. Roberts Wilson, Jr., Mitchell H. Tyner, Jackson, for appellant.
Charles J. Mikhail, Jackson, for appellee.
En Banc.
McRAE, Justice, for the court:
The central question in this appeal is whether an attorney may ethically tape record a conversation with a potential party opponent without the knowledge or consent of the other conversant. We hold that under the circumstances attending this case, such conduct offends neither the Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct nor…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Robertson; Dissent; Concurrence · Robertson; Concurrence · Banks.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doby v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Middlebrook v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- National Life and Acc. Ins. Co. v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Netterville v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mabus v. St. James Episcopal ChurchMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- The Mississippi Bar v. ATTORNEY STMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- Rogers v. the Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- LS v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson v. HaleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.