Legal Opinion

The Mississippi Bar v. ATTORNEY ST

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1993No. 90-BA-0552PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

621 So.2d 229 (1993)

THE MISSISSIPPI BAR

v.

ATTORNEY ST.

No. 90-BA-0552.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 17, 1993.

Michael B. Martz, Charles J. Mikhail, Jackson, for appellant.

James F. Noble, III, Charles G. Copeland, Copeland Cook Taylor & Bush, Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

McRAE, Justice, for the Court:

On petition for rehearing, the original opinions of the Court are withdrawn and this opinion substituted therefor.

In this appeal, we consider whether sanctions should be imposed against an attorney who vehemently denied to a potential witness with whom he was speaking on…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Banks; Concurrence · Banks; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Foote v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. National Life and Acc. Ins. Co. v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Netterville v. Mississippi State BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fougerousse v. Miss. State Bar Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mississippi State Bar v. BlackmonMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. PelsMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  2. The Mississippi Bar v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  3. LS v. Mississippi BarMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Mississippi Bar v. SweeneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Prb Docket No. 2007-046Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API