Legal Opinion

People v. Riley

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1950No. Crim. 5054PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant was charged in separate counts with (1) robbery and (2) murder. He pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity to each count. After trial, the jury returned verdicts of guilty on both counts. As to the second count, the jury found the crime to be murder in the first degree and fixed the penalty at death. Defendant was then tried before the same jury on the issue of sanity and was found sane. A motion for a new trial was made and denied. This is an automatic appeal from the judgment imposing the death penalty and from the order denying a motion for a new trial in relation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. KoenigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. KuykendallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API