Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 2018No. A17-0683PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Miguel Angel Vasquez appeals his first-degree murder conviction. Vasquez argues that the district court committed reversible error when the court admitted into evidence testimony from his treating physicians and a burn expert. Because we conclude that any error in the admission of the challenged evidence did not substantially influence the verdict, we affirm.

*644FACTS

Following a bench trial, the district court found Vasquez guilty of the premeditated murder of Amber Lechuga. Lechuga and Vasquez shared an apartment in Springfield. They had been romantically involved…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. LeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JarosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  2. State of Minnesota v. Raymont Michael RedmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Ryan James MartensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
  4. State of Minnesota v. Walter Pierre ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan James Martens, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API