Legal Opinion

Williard, Inc. v. Powertherm Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1982No. 80-3-825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellants are subcontractors of B. Bornstein & Son, Inc.,, who have not been fully paid for their services rendered in the construction of Bamberger’s Department Store in Delaware County. Appellees are creditors of Bornstein whose present claims are unrelated to the Bamberger construction project. All parties seek to satisfy their claims against Bornstein from that portion of the Bamberger contract price which has not been paid to Bornstein. The contract balance of $147,396, has been interpleaded into court by the owners of the department store, who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  2. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Central Surety And Insurance Corporation v. Martin Infante Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Getty v. Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the BlindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Slavin v. SlavinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Himes v. Cameron County Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Temp-Way Corp. v. R.M. Shoemaker Co. (In Re Temp-Way Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Dal-Tile Corp. v. Reitmeyer (In Re Buono)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Trevdan Building Supply v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Trevdan Building Supply v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API