Legal Opinion

Getty v. Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the Blind

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1900No. Appeal, No. 385PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 385, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dee. T., 1898, No. 1259, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity by subcontractors to compel owners of a building to account for retained percentage. The defendant demurred to the bill. The averments of the bill and the grounds for demurrer are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. •Errors assigned were in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 385, Jan. T., 1899, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dee. T., 1898, No. 1259, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity by subcontractors to compel owners of a building to account for retained percentage. The defendant demurred to the bill. The averments of the bill and the grounds for demurrer are fully stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. •Errors assigned were in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill. Under the fact stated in the bill appellees have no right to retain the fund. as against appellants and refuse to pay it to anybody: White v.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The Pennsylvania Institution for the Instruction of the Blind, this defendant, on June 80, 1897, entered into a contract with Warner H. Jenkins & Company, by which Jenkins & Company undertook to construct for defendant at Overbrook, a building designed as a home and school for the blind; the contract was duly recorded, as provided by Act of June 26, 1895, P. L. 369. It is quite elaborate as to details, and minute as to specifications. Clause C is as follows: “ There shall be no lien or right to claim a lien against the building or its site for work or labor done or *574m…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lesikar Construction Company v. Acoustex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BergenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Gilkeson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. B. Bornstein & Son, Inc. v. R. H. MacY & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API