Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. De Concini v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1952No. 5256PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the validity of certain annexation proceedings. On January 27, 1948, the Phoenix City. Council unanimously passed an ordinance (number 47 32) by the terms of which certain territory was purportedly annexed to and made a part of the city.

Later one Joseph P. Price, a real property owner within the affected area, presented his verified complaint obj ecting to the adoption of this ordinance to the then attorney general, Evo De Concini. Pursuant thereto, the attorney general on behalf of the state of Arizona duly filed this action in quo warranto to test…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. State Ex Rel West University PlaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Phoenix v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Barbe v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Crocher v. AbelIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Conover v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. McCune v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Powers v. CarpenterArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Safford v. Town of ThatcherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Carefree Improvement Ass'n v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API