Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 825DC921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

In Teachey v. Teachey, 46 N.C. App. 332, 334, 264 S.E. 2d 786, 787 (1980), this Court, speaking through Martin, Judge (Harry C.), said:

For civil contempt to be applicable, the defendant must be able to comply with the order or take reasonable measures that would enable him to comply with the order. We hold this means he must have the present ability to comply, or the present ability to take reasonable measures that would enable him to comply, with the order. (Citation omitted.)

In the present case, the defendant excepted to the following finding of fact made by the trial judge:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Teachey v. TeacheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McBride v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Bishop v. BishopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. McMiller v. McMillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API