Legal Opinion

Lee v. Lee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 1985No. 8518DC353PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant does not dispute the court’s ability to enforce its previous orders. Defendant contends that there is no determination that he has the present ability to comply with the civil contempt order requiring him to pay $1,000.00 of the arrearage. We agree.

In Teachey v. Teachey, 46 N.C. App. 332, 334, 264 S.E. 2d 786, 787 (1980), this Court held that:

For civil contempt to be applicable, the defendant must be able to comply with the order or take reasonable measures that would enable him to comply with the order. We hold this means he must have the present ability to comply,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teachey v. TeacheyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. McMiller v. McMillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Chloride, Inc. v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McBride v. McBrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. LaFell v. LaFellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API