Legal Opinion

Dickson Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1954No. Appeal, 221PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

The trustees under the will of Samuel Dickson, deceased, filed a Fourth Account at the audit of which his son, Arthur G. Dickson, the life tenant, claimed he was then entitled to 4/7ths of the principal of the trust by a coalescence or merger of the life estate and remainder interest.

Testator left his residuary estate in trust to pay the income to his son Arthur for his life, remainder to his children or issue, if any, and if he left no child or issue living at his death “to the nieces of my late wife living at the time of my * death.”

Testator was survived (1) by a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Sterrett's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Riegel v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Rehr v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. List v. RodneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vandergrift EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Walton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. State Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kauaian Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dickson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Davis EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API