Legal Opinion

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1993No. S026785PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

4 Cal.4th 893 (1993)

844 P.2d 534

16 Cal. Rptr.2d 215

SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. S026785.

Supreme Court of California.

February 4, 1993.

COUNSEL

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, John F. Haggerty, Assistant City Attorney, and Henry G. Morris, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Appellant.

Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson and Michael Hickok for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Rutan & Tucker, John L. Fellows III and Carrie Phelan as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

We granted…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Resort, Inc. v. Dennis HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API