Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Rohm & Haas Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1972No. Appeal, No. 818 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order

And Now, this 19th day of April, 1972, it appearing to the Court that there was a transposition error in the Supplemental Opinion and Order of this Court dated April 7, 1972, in the above-noted matter, it is hereby ordered that the Order of this Court dated April 7, 1972, is hereby vacated, and the Supplemental Opinion is amended to read as shown on the Supplemental Opinion attached hereto, and the Order is amended to read:

Based upon the discussion in the Supplemental Opinion, the Opinion of March 13, 1972 is affirmed as *289entered; however, it is hereby ordered that Rohm & Haas Company,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smethport Area School District v. BowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Yeager v. United Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. McConnell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Plains Township School District AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Riley's Grille Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. COSHEY v. BealCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Academy Plaza Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Revision of TaxesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. In re Revocation of Restaurant Liquor License No. R-8030Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Berry v. Sheaffer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1987
  5. Commonwealth v. Badman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API