Legal Opinion
COSHEY v. Beal
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 9, 1976No. 127 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
Raymond O. Coshey, Charles R. Kaylor and Dorothy M. Kerchner (Plaintiffs) seek by this proceeding in mandamus to compel defendants — more specifically, the Department of Public Welfare (Department) — to refund to Plaintiffs monies wrongfully paid to the Department out of delayed lump-sum social security benefits as reimbursement for public assistance previously received.
It is not disputed by defendants that Plaintiffs are entitled to the funds they seek, and, therefore, the circumstances under which the funds were collected by the Department do not concern us.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Good v. WohlgemuthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Wohlgemuth v. ArmacostCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Duggan v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Rohm and Haas Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- In re Mausoleum Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Arena Beverage Corp. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. KnoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- St. Clair v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.