Legal Opinion
Ohio Art Co. v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 20, 1992No. 92 C 947PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Ohio Art Company (“Ohio Art”) has sued three defendants — Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. (“Galoob”), GALCO International Toys, N.V. (“GALCO”) and Vaughn Associates, Inc. (“Vaughn”) — in a multi-count Complaint charging defendants with violations of Ohio Art’s intellectual property rights. This Court has conducted an evidentiary hearing occupying several trial days (the “Hearing”) to consider Ohio Art’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 65 and the requirements of Rule 52(a), what are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marketing Displays, Inc. v. TrafFix Devices, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Miyano MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Miyanohitec MacHinery, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Planet Hollywood (Region IV), Inc. v. Hollywood Casino Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Winning Ways, Inc. v. Holloway Sportswear, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Sassafras Enterprises, Inc. v. Roshco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.