Hicks v. Biddle
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
• (after stating the facts as above). The assignments of error question the integrity of the final decree granting relief to the complainant for failure of proof in two respects.
The first paragraph of the bill avers, among other facts, that “on the 5th day of October, 1917, orator T. W. Biddle was. duly appointed and qualified as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of said H. P. Hicks, and is now such trustee and brings this suit in his capacity as such trustee.” These averments are denied by both of the respondents, and there is an absence of evidence proving, or tending to prove, these…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Yeend v. WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Rapier v. Gulf City Paper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Espalla v. Richard & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sylvest v. StowersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Ex Parte Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- J. A. Owens & Co. v. BlanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Hooks v. HooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.