Legal Opinion

J. A. Owens & Co. v. Blanks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 6, 1932No. 5 Div. 109PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Brady Steen Blanks, appellee, filed her original bill against J. M. Atkins and J. A. Owens, doing business under the partnership name of Atkins & Owens, to establish a resulting-trust in a one-half interest in 80 acres of land, known in the record as the Marbury Lands.

The cause was before us on appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill. Blanks v. Atkins et al., 217 Ala. 596, 117 So. 193.

The bill was later amended to meet the defects pointed out in that decision, and making party respondent L. A. Owens successor in interest to J. M. Atkins, now deceased.

The present appeal is from…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lehman v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  2. Preston & Stetson v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Butts v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Tilford v. Torrey & LockwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  5. Corley v. VizardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lightsey v. StoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Gandy v. HaglerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Van Hoof v. Van HoofSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Hooks v. HooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API