Legal Opinion

Natale v. Mazzuki

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

Plaintiffs move to strike out the first, second and third affirmative defenses of the answer of the defendant, Joseph Mazzuki, as legally insufficient.

The action was brought for injunctive relief requiring defendants to remove a portion of the outside wall of their building which, plaintiffs assert, encroaches upon their real property, or for an alternative award of damages.

The first affirmative defense is based upon the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 992 of the Civil Practice Act and the averment that the alleged encroachment does not exceed the dimensions therein prescribed and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. City of Syracuse v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Hahl v. . SugoNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Baron v. . KornNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Education of Central School District No. 2 v. NyquistNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API