Legal Opinion

Sherman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 20, 2018No. 17-1830Published

1Opinion of the Court

0RfGtiltAt" llntllt @nftp! $rtsttg @ourt of frlprut @lsrmg No. 17-1830C Fifed: August 20,20'18 FILED i< + {. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** AU6 2 0 20t8 LEELA H. SHERMAN, U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Plaintiff, Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion To Dismiss; v. Subject Matter Jurisdiction ; Federal Retirement Benefi ts Claim. UNITED STATES, Defendant. ,1. * * * * + 1. !t :* * * * * * * * * ** Leela H. Sherman, pro se, Laguna Beach, CA. Joshua A. Mandlebaum, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, united states Department of Justice, washington, D.c. for defendant. with him were…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API