Legal Opinion
MERVILUS v. UNION COUNTY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 26, 2021No. 2:14-cv-07470Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY EMMANUEL MERVILUS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-7470 (ES) (MAH) v. OPINION UNION COUNTY, DANIEL VANISKA, and JOHN KAMINSKAS, Defendants. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the motion of defendants John Kaminskas, Daniel Vaniska, and Union County (collectively, “Defendants”) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). (D.E. No. 163 (“Motion” or “Mot.”)). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court decides this matter without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L. Civ. R.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.