Legal Opinion
Fabbrini v. City of Dunsmuir
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 2011No. 09-16292PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant David Fabbrini was sued by the City of Dunsmuir, California (“the City”), for his failure to sufficiently collateralize a municipal loan. The City’s lawsuit included a request for declaratory relief regarding Fabbrini’s obligations, as well as a fraud claim. Subsequently the City voluntarily dismissed that lawsuit. Fabbrini then filed a federal court action against the City and various City officials, alleging a § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution and a state law defamation claim.
Pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP statute,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Micha v. Sun Life Assurance of Canada, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- (PS) Chipman v. Enloe Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- David E. Henry, M.D. v. The Queen's Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Micha v. Sun Life Assurance of Canada, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.