Legal Opinion
StairMaster Sports/Medical Products, Inc. v. Groupe Procycle, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 3, 1998No. Civil Action 97-396 MMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Murray M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
StairMaster Sports/Medical Products, Inc. (“StairMaster”) filed a patent infringement action against Groupe Procycle, Inc. and Procycle U.S.A., Inc. (collectively “Procycle”), alleging infringement of their U.S. Patent No. Re. 34,959 entitled “Stair-Climbing Exercise Apparatus” (“the ’959 Patent”). Specifically, StairMaster alleges that Procycle’s Quantum and Executive Stair-Climbing devices infringe its ’959 Patent. Procycle answered StairMaster’s complaint by denying it had infringed the ’959 Patent and by counterclaiming for a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dentsply International, Inc. v. Kerr Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- BP Amoco Chemical Co. v. Sun Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- LNP Engineering Plastics, Inc. v. Miller Waste Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- SuperGuide Corp. v. DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.