Legal Opinion

Village of Lake Barrington v. Hogan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 1995No. 2-94-0839PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

The plaintiffs, the Village of Lake Barrington and the Village of Lake Barrington Special Service Area Number Three (collectively the Village), filed a three-count amended complaint against the defendants, Mary E. Hogan, Sam Loiacono and Ruth Loiacono. Count I of the Village’s amended complaint sought a declaration that the ordinances it adopted creating a special service area were Valid. Count II of the amended complaint alleged that the defendants tortiously interfered with the Village’s contract with the company that was to provide the bonding for the project. Count III of the amended…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of Strocchia v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. Stahelin v. Forest Preserve DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Matter of Estate of WallisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. McGee v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  5. Habitat Co. v. McClureAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API