Legal Opinion
United States v. Clark
District Court, D. Montana
Decided March 30, 1927No. Nos. 532, 547, 548, 552PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRAT, District Judge.
The petitioners assert that the affidavits for search warrants in all of the foregoing eases were defective, for the reason that no probable cause was shown therein for their issuance, and that the property sought under the search warrants was not particularly described. The affidavits in three of the above cases, 532, 548, and 552, are as follows:
“Before me, Wilmer Jeanette, a United States commissioner for the District of Montana, personally appeared Charles L. Sheridan, who, being by me first sworn and orally examined, deposes and says that he is a duly appointed and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- In re 14 East Seventeenth StreetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960