State v. Roggensack

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1962:

(on motion for rehearing). We are not persuaded by defendant’s arguments, on this motion, challenging our answers to the questions certified. We deem it appropriate, however, to make this comment in view of defendant’s suggestion that a defendant may properly “complain that the process by which he. was selected [for prosecution] violated the constitutional guaranty of equal protection of the laws.” Whether or not such a complaint is *635supported by the record in this case was not put before us by the questions of law certified. Those questions were,…