Legal Opinion

State v. Konkol

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

As indicated by the certified questions, the information contained seven counts. The first count charges that defendant, being at that time town chairman of the town of Stockton, had in his private employ one Victor Sankey; that defendant caused to be delivered to Sankey a town order directing the treasurer of the town of Stockton to p'ay to San-key the sum of $6 of the town funds in payment for services rendered by Sankey to defendant personally, and not for services rendered to the town of Stockton. This act is charged to constitute a violation of the provision of sec. 348.28, Stats. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WentlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. ParishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. State v. KaiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. HenleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RoggensackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. RoggensackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API