Vickers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.
—Appellant was convicted for incest and his punishment assessed at the lowest prescribed by law. This is the second appeal in this case. The first is reported in 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 628, 154 S. W. Rep., 578’, from which a sufficient statement of the case can be seen.
The evidence of the corroboration on this trial is stronger than the record showed in the other appeal. None of the questions decided on that appeal are raised in this. The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction on this trial. In fact, appellant, neither in his brief, nor oral…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Coffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Battles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Lipham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lovine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.