Legal Opinion

United States v. Duke Energy Corp.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided October 22, 2003No. 1:00 CV 1262PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*469 ORDER

ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a number of motions. They all relate to this Court’s April 11, 2003 Order. United States v. Duke Energy, 214 F.R.D. 383 (M.D.N.C. 2003). There, the Court granted the plaintiff United States of America’s motion to compel discovery of documents relating to communications which defendant Duke Energy Corporation (“Duke Energy”) received from the Utility Air Regulatory Group (“UARG”). The UARG is an association composed of electrical companies, including Duke Energy, and four trade associations. Id. at 389. It claims…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Fayetteville Investors v. Commercial Builders, Incorporated American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  2. Wootten v. VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
  3. Akeva L.L.C. v. Adidas America, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
  4. Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Madison River Management Co. v. Business Management Software Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API