Legal Opinion

Gerardo Cordova v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 16, 2017No. 16-2674Unpublished

1Per curiam

Gerardo Reyes Cordova petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. Cordova moved to reopen the proceedings on the ground that his counsel was ineffective in advising him to withdraw his application for cancellation of removal and accept voluntary departure.

After careful review, we conclude the BIA did not abuse its discretion in rejecting Cordova’s claim of ineffective assistance and dismissing his appeal. See Valencia v. Holder, 657 F.3d 745, 748 (8th Cir.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abdulkadir Haji Dakane v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Arturo Andrade-Zamora v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Amardeep Singh v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Valencia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API