Legal Opinion
ME Pub Util Cmsn v. FERC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 30, 2006No. 05-1001PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
454 F.3d 278
MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, et al., Petitioners
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company, et al., Intervenors.
No. 05-1001.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 21, 2006.
Decided June 30, 2006.
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Charles G. Cole argued the cause for Transmission Owner Petitioners and supporting intervenors. With him on the briefs were David B. Raskin, Alice E. Loughran, Kenneth G. Jaffe, Elias G. Farrah, Mary E. Grover,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- United States v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Holiday Cvs, L.L.C. v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- E KY Power Coop v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.