Das v. Rodgers
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FREEDMAN, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of strict foreclosure, rendered by the trial court, following the trial court’s acceptance of an attorney trial referee report. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to correct the attorney trial referee’s findings of fact as requested by the defendant, (2) found that the defendant’s predecessor in interest, David Rubinfeld, transferred the subject *244attached property without notice to the plaintiff and in violation of a restraining order, and (3) concluded that the judgment hen filed by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Waterbury Police UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Boltuch v. RainaudSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- City of New Haven v. Local 884, Council 4, AFSCMESupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Middlesex Insurance v. CastellanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Das v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Olsen v. Weiss, No. 536688 (Jul. 20, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. AhmedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023