Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 24, 1986No. 150, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The question presented is whether, in light of Walczak v. State, 302 Md. 422, 488 A.2d 949 (1985), a defendant in a criminal case may, as part of a plea agreement, lawfully be ordered to pay restitution in an amount greater than that involved in the crime of which he was convicted.

I

Bernard Lee was charged in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County in a two-count indictment (1) with having forged a check on August 18, 1980 in the amount of $198 in violation of Maryland Code (1982 Repl. Vol.), Article 27, § 44 and (2) with theft of $3,155 between the dates of July 31 and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. United States v. Howard M. GeringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Richard W. SuterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Karl Lee Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Pete v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Goff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Grey v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Silver v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API