Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 16, 1971No. 29-70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COWEN, Chief Judge:

This transportation case comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks to recover $405 which it alleges to be the amount of demurrage charges due to it for the period from November 1966 through June 1967, in accordance with its published tariffs filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission.

I

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, an Illinois corporation, is a common…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Oregon—Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Western Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Gulf RR Co. v. Sankey Brothers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jetco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API