Hoeflin v. Riverside Press
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The relator was denied compensation by the industrial commission and sued out a writ of certiorari to review its decision.
The relator was an employe in the respondent’s printing establishment and claims to have been injured by straining himself in lifting one of the-heavy forms used in his work. This happened on Monday, March 10, 1930. The relator dragged the form from the stone on which it had been resting to the machine where he intended to register it. When he got to the machine, he attempted to lift it up and got it as far as his knees, when it slipped and fell. He grabbed it so that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baaken v. Naufft & BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gans v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Schwendig v. Anderson & Hedwall Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Taddi v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932