Legal Opinion

Thomsen v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1966No. 38575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Poyhonen, J. † —

This is a case where the owners of a blueberry farm and cannery gave a public agency an easement to use a 20-foot strip of land adjacent to a river bank for river improvement and flood control purposes and later found themselves virtually out of business. Understandably they want to be reimbursed for their loss.

For clarity, a sketch of the property involved is shown.

The respondents purchased areas one, two, three, and four in 1922 from Cowley Investment Company, have been in posession at all times since, and from 1934 on have used the land for growing blueberries in commercial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wendel v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Oklahoma City v. Hill Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. Desimone v. Mutual Materials Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cullen v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Yakima County v. Tullar, Washington Territory1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Hall v. SchoenwetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Kreger v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Gissel v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hanson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API