Legal Opinion

Desimone v. Mutual Materials Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1944No. 29215PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J. —

This action was instituted by plaintiffs, as possessors and cultivators of a tract of land in King county, to recover for damage to growing crops on the tract of land in question alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s tortious casting of sand and water thereon and to recover for damage from water and sand cast by defendant upon another tract of land of which plaintiffs were the owners in fee. Plaintiffs also sought a permanent injunction restraining defendant from discharging water upon their land. The cause was tried to the court, which entered a decree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berg v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fuglede v. Wenatchee District Cooperative Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Cullen v. BowenWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. VennigerholzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Stratton v. U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Rottinghaus v. HowellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Desimone v. Mutual Materials Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Golden v. MountWashington Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API