Legal Opinion
Lipiro v. Remee Products
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 8, 1999No. 98 Civ. 2849 (BDP)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Christine Lipiro, Michelle Caruso, and Stacy Savige commenced an action alleging sex discrimination and retaliation against defendants Remee Products, Elias Muhlrad, Kenneth Pimental and Joseph Chiariello.
Defendant Remee impled Judy Neuffer alleging that Neuffer, another employee who was in charge of monitoring and preventing sexual harassment, is hable to Re-mee for all or part of any claims brought against it by the first-party plaintiffs. 1 In addition, Remee asserts breach of fiduciary duty and breach of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carruthers v. FlaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- William Grecia v. Brass Lion Entertainment, Inc., Justin Smith, Bryna Smith, Edward Robles, and Roc Nation LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026