Brasker v. Cirese
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
Plaintiffs-appellants, husband ánd wife, sought to cancel a sheriff’s deed issued to defendant-respondent as a result of proceedings under the Land Tax Collection Law, §§ 141.210-141.810 (all section references are RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.). The trial chancellor found plaintiffs not entitled to relief and entered judgment dismissing their petition.
Plaintiffs had been the record owners of the instantly involved house and lot in Kansas City since 1939. The county taxes were delinquent for the years 1944 to 1948, inclusive. An in rem action was instituted under the Land Tax…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spitcaufsky v. HattenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Jones v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Bussen Realty Co. v. BensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Fadler v. GabbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Reis v. La PrestoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Johnson v. StullSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Human Development Corp. of Metropolitan St. Louis v. WefelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Owen v. City of BransonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.