Hudson v. Voreis
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marshall Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellant’s. action was to enjoin appellees from opening a highway through his lands, to his injury, as specifically alleged, and upon the authority alone of an order of the Board of Commissioners of Marshall county, in the following words: “It is ordered by the board that a road be established and opened as prayed for in the petition in this case.’’ The complaint avers that said order is null and void, in that it did not define the width of the road proposed.
The court below sustained a demurrer to the com*643plaint, and the correctness of that ruling is the question here presented for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Adams v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Strong v. MakeeverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helms v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Underhill v. FranzIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Indiana Department of Conservation v. Pulaski Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Todd v. CrailIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Eads v. KumleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.