Legal Opinion

Reed v. Zipcar, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 31, 2012No. Civil Case No. 11-11340-NMGPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Naomi Reed (“Reed”) brings this putative class action against defendant Zipcar, Inc. (“Zipcar”) alleging that certain fees charged to members of the rental car service are unlawful. Before the Court is Zipcar’s motion to dismiss.

I. Background

A. Zipcar

Zipcar provides a car-sharing service in major metropolitan areas, including Boston, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Members have access to Zipcar vehicles, located in reserved parking spots at designated locations throughout each city, for as short a time as one hour or as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Platten v. HG Bermuda Exempted Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary v. QLT Phototherapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Tomasella v. The Hershey Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. Ferreira v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  5. Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edge Pharma, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API