Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 3, 2002No. 99 C 8438Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
BOBRICK, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court are the cross-motions of defendants Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) and Kuehne & Nagel Inc. (“K & N”) for summary judgment on the issue of K & N’s entitlement to attorney’s fees.
I. BACKGROUND
The ease that gave rise to this litigation over attorney’s fees was a suit to recover for damages to two shipments of equipment for a cellular infrastructure base station. FedEx handled the two shipments in question, which went from Dallas, Texas, to Osaka, Japan, on December 29, 1997, and January 28, 1998. Shipment was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lori M. GLEASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MESIROW FINANCIAL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Zicherman Ex Rel. Estate of Kole v. Korean Air Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Barry Richards, Karen Richards, Roland Pepin v. Combined Insurance Company of America and Credit Life Insurance Company of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.