Legal Opinion

Baldridge v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1954No. Appeal, 85PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In this action for criminal conversation the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000 composed of $7,500 compensatory and $2,500 punitive damages. The defendant filed motions for judgment n.o.v. and for a new trial, both of which motions the learned court below refused. The refusal of a new trial was conditioned on the plaintiff’s filing a remittitur for so much of the verdict as was in excess of $5,000. The remittitur was duly filed and judgment was entered for the plaintiff on the reduced verdict. This appeal by the defendant followed. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Antonelli v. XenakisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Veit v. Class & Nachod Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Roney v. Clearfield County Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fadgen v. LenknerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Di Blasio v. KolodnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Liles v. BalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API